Category | Buyer Question | Evidence to Request | Strong Signal | Warning Signal | Max. Points |
Comparable-event evidence | What similar events have you actually delivered, and what did you own? | Comparable case study, reference, photos, drawings, scope description | Evidence closely matches the event's rooms, systems, schedule, venue constraints, and complexity | Prestigious logos or a highlight reel with no explanation of actual scope | 15 |
Scope completeness | Exactly what is included, excluded, assumed, or supplied by others? | Detailed scope, exclusions, assumptions, responsibility list | Major labor, equipment, management, venue, rehearsal, redundancy, and strike items are explicit | Important work is buried in assumptions, exclusions, or “TBD” language | 15 |
Team and accountability | Who will plan and run the project? | Named project lead, show lead, department heads, key operators, subcontractor disclosure | Key roles are identified with a clear chain of command | Vendor will not identify decision-makers or critical onsite roles | 12 |
Venue and advance planning | How will the venue be technically advanced before load-in? | Site-survey plan, venue coordination notes, schedule, drawings where appropriate | Venue constraints, access, power, rigging, network, schedule, and controlled services are addressed early | Venue coordination is deferred until immediately before load-in | 10 |
Technical testing and verification | What will be tested before rehearsal, and how will completion be recorded? | System-test checklist, verification sheet, signal-flow documentation, backup-switch procedure | Acceptance criteria, test owner, timing, and completion record are defined | “Our technicians always test everything” with no stated method | 10 |
Redundancy and contingency | What happens when a critical system or person fails? | Backup plan, spare-system list, switchover procedure, escalation plan | Failure modes, backup paths, owners, and transfer procedures are specific | “We have backups” without explaining location, readiness, or switchover | 10 |
Safety and accessibility responsibility | Which requirements apply, and who owns them? | Responsibility matrix, venue requirements, relevant plans or documentation | Responsibilities are assigned according to scope, venue, applicable requirements, and specialists | Generic “we are compliant” language without identifying applicable requirements | 8 |
Communication and change control | How are decisions, changes, approvals, and cost impacts documented? | Communication plan, approval path, change-order process | Decision authority and commercial changes are documented before work proceeds | Informal verbal changes with no defined approval or pricing process | 8 |
References | Can comparable clients verify how the company performed? | Relevant reference contacts | References describe similar work and can explain scope, problems, recovery, and invoicing | References are inaccessible, unrelated, or cannot describe what the company actually did | 6 |
Commercial transparency | Can the buyer understand what drives the total? | Itemized proposal, assumptions, exclusions, labor terms, travel/freight, cancellation terms | Major commercial dependencies are visible before comparison | Headline total obscures substantial exclusions or undefined add-ons | 6 |
Total | 100 |
Scope Item | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Excluded? | Assumption | Owner |
Project management | ||||||
Site survey / technical advance | ||||||
Drawings / technical documents | ||||||
Audio | ||||||
Video / LED / projection | ||||||
Cameras / IMAG | ||||||
Lighting | ||||||
Staging | ||||||
Rigging | ||||||
Temporary power | ||||||
Network / streaming | ||||||
Intercom / communications | ||||||
Crew roles / headcount | ||||||
Rehearsal | ||||||
Backup equipment | ||||||
Labor minimums | ||||||
Overtime rules | ||||||
Travel / freight | ||||||
Sub-rentals | ||||||
Permits / engineering | ||||||
Venue / union charges | ||||||
Accessibility systems | ||||||
Strike | ||||||
Change-order terms | ||||||
Cancellation terms |
Dependency | Failure Mode | Primary Owner | Backup | Switchover Method | Tested? | Recovery Constraint |
Presentation / playback | ||||||
Audio console / signal path | ||||||
Wireless RF | ||||||
Video switching | ||||||
LED / display system | ||||||
Power | ||||||
Streaming / network | ||||||
Intercom | ||||||
Critical operator |
Responsibility | Client | Venue | Production Company | Specialist Vendor | Technical Labor Provider | AHJ / Other Authority | Unresolved |
Temporary electrical | |||||||
Rigging | |||||||
Temporary structures | |||||||
RF / wireless | |||||||
Venue network | |||||||
Stage access | |||||||
Assistive listening | |||||||
Weather monitoring | |||||||
Crowd / public-safety interface | |||||||
Emergency communications | |||||||
System backup | |||||||
Replacement personnel |
Issue | Source | Type | Useful Buyer Question |
Worker fall hazards | OSHA | Federal workplace regulation | What rule applies to this exact work activity and location? |
Temporary electrical | OSHA + applicable electrical/AHJ requirements | Regulatory / code context | Who designs, approves, and operates temporary power? |
Accessibility | ADA / U.S. Access Board | Federal accessibility framework | Who checks applicable accessibility obligations? |
AV system verification | AVIXA | Industry / consensus standard | Which acceptance tests will be documented? |
Severe weather | Consensus standard | Who monitors conditions and makes hold/resume decisions? | |
Entertainment rigging | ESTA E1 standards | Consensus standards | Which rigging requirements apply to this venue and scope? |
Outdoor temporary structures | ANSI E1.21 + adopted local requirements | Consensus / code interaction | Is engineering, permitting, or AHJ review required? |
Seating Capacity | Minimum Receivers |
50 or fewer | 2 |
200 | 8 |
500 | 20 |
1,000 | 36 |
2,000 | 55 |